RadAI Case Study: Why Inventive AI is 2× More Accurate Than Other Vendors

Learn how RadAI transformed their RFP workflow using Inventive’s AI Agents

Responses That Need Barely a Tweak

With Inventive AI, Rad AI’s responses were ready to send with zero or minimal edits. The AI-generated answers were so accurate and persuasive that they resonated with evaluators immediately, saving hours of manual polishing.

Effortless Knowledge Hub Management

By connecting their document systems and uploading past RFPs, Rad AI used Inventive AI’s built-in content manager to flag outdated or conflicting entries keeping information clean and accurate while eliminating manual upkeep.

About RAD-AI

RAD-AI, a radiologist-led pioneer in healthcare generative AI, empowers physicians by automating reporting and reducing burnout.

As the company scaled, enterprise RFPs surged Jason Campbell (Sr. Sales Engineer) and Andrew MacLean (Sales Enablement Lead) led the evaluation of multiple RFP software platforms. The Result? Inventive delivered 2x the usable answers compared to newer AI entrants and easily outperformed legacy tools like Responsive and Loopio.

1. The Pain: Content Management Challenges & Missing Context

  • Lean team, steep workload. Jason had been on the job just three months when five hospital RFPs landed in succession. Every answer had to be pulled from scattered PDFs, legacy worksheets and tribal knowledge.
  • Risk of costly errors. With innovative AI products on the line, an inaccurate “yes” could snowball into an implementation nightmare. “If we win an RFP and later can’t do something we promised, we’re in trouble,” Jason noted.
“If we’d been here for three or four years, we could answer off the top of our head. But as new hires, we were hunting down answers for every RFP.” – Jason Campbell, RAD AI

2. Triple-Blind Test: Inventive vs Responsive, AutoRFP & Tribble)

Andrew, an engineer by background, built a brutal evaluation:

  1. Same data in. Each vendor received identical brochures, historical RFPs, and website copy.
  2. Same questions out. A 100-question battery covering product, security and IT workflows.
  3. Quality weighted 100×. Feature lists mattered, but answer accuracy was the make-or-break metric.

3. Why Inventive AI Won By a Wide Margin

The Bake-Off Results (Rad AI’s words):

“Inventive delivered twice the usable answers compared to AutoRFP, Tribble, and Glean. Responsive and Loopio didn’t even make it to the pilot - they’re legacy tools, and past experience showed they couldn’t deliver AI-first accuracy.” – Andrew MacLean, Sales Enablement Lead.

Result Comparison Table with Other Vendors

Criteria Inventive AI AutoRFP/Tribble/Responsive Loopio (Legacy Vendors)
Answer Accuracy ≈2× more usable answers with only minor tweaks Inconsistent, shallow responses Rejected early — poor past experience
Tone & Style Sales-ready answers with value statements Generic, lacked sales nuance Outdated workflows, literal replies
Conflict Management Only platform that flagged outdated docs Absent Not evaluated
Hallucinations Returned “not enough info” when data missing Frequently over-confident Not evaluated
Product Responsiveness Fixes landed the next day during pilot Slow or unclear roadmaps Not evaluated
“Inventive produced the best quality answers out of every tool we evaluated — by far. Tribble even asked us to rerun with their new model, and the results were worse than the original.” – Jason Campbell, Sr. Sales Engineer

‍

The Takeaway (Rad AI’s words):

“Inventive’s AI gave us answers that looked like we had written them ourselves — sales and marketing ready. The others were just yes/no or generic replies.” – Andrew MacLean, Sales Enablement Lead.

“Tribble even asked us to rerun the test with their new model… and the results were worse than the original.” – Jason Campbell, Sr. Sales Engineer

4. Early Impact: Faster, Smarter, More Collaborative

  • Speed to submission. The pilot cut answer drafting from days to hours, freeing Jason to focus on demos instead of detective work.
  • Shared brainpower. Assign and comment features pulled product managers into the workflow instead of siloed email threads.
  • Competitive edge. “It’s going to make us more accurate and more competitive,” Jason said - critical when displacing 20-year incumbents.

5. Next Up: Company-Wide Knowledge & Sales Enablement

RAD-AI now plans to:

  1. Expand the knowledge base so Inventive answers every security questionnaire that arrives weekly.
  2. Give sales team a Slack-native Q&A bot for instant product answers — and a built-in feedback loop to keep docs current.
  3. Load competitor collateral to surface differentiators automatically during future RFPs.

6. Lessons for Other Teams

Andrew’s advice for anyone shopping RFP AI:

“Load every vendor with the same data and fire the same questions. Ignore fancy workflows at first — the first-pass answer quality tells you everything.”

7. The Bottom Line

Inventive AI turned RAD-AI’s RFP response from a manual slog into a competitive advantage. In head-to-head testing, it delivered twice the usable answers compared to AutoRFP, Tribble, and Glean - and was chosen over legacy platforms like Responsive and Loopio.

For teams competing in high-stakes RFPs, Inventive AI has proven itself the superior product in the market, where speed and accuracy can decide whether you make the shortlist or win the deal.

Curious how Inventive can do the same for you? Book a Demo

Reach out for a custom pilot - let the answers speak for themselves. Visit Inventive AI to learn more