Responsive Price, Features, Reviews, and Ratings 2026

Responsive (formerly RFPIO) is an RFP solution for teams, offering valuable content management and collaboration features. However, as RFP workloads explode, with industry reports revealing that companies now spend 24 hours writing a proposal and involve 7 people in the process, the platform is starting to show its limitations.

The challenge is clear: many teams are still using RFP tools built a decade ago, designed for simpler workflows and slower sales cycles. As RFP complexity and volume continue to grow, traditional platforms like Responsive are struggling to keep up with the scale and speed required today.

This has led to a shift towards AI-driven RFP platforms like Inventive AI. Built for modern businesses, Inventive AI offers advanced automation and real-time content management, helping teams respond quickly and accurately without sacrificing quality.

In this blog, we’ll explore Responsive’s pricing, features, strengths, and limitations, and explain why AI-first RFP automation, such as Inventive AI, is fast becoming the new standard for enterprises looking to improve their RFP processes.

Key Takeaways

• Responsive (RFPIO) offers strong collaboration and centralized content management for mid-sized teams.
• It works well for standard proposal workflows, but becomes harder to scale as RFP volumes and compliance layers increase.
• Inventive AI provides multi-agent automation, contextual intelligence, and verified, zero-hallucination responses.
• Enterprise sales teams using Inventive AI report 50% higher win rates, 90% faster response cycles, and improved cross-functional collaboration.
• Responsive suits small to mid-sized teams; Inventive AI is suitable for all kinds of teams starting from small-scale to big businesses and enterprises with multi-department workflows, security questionnaires, and global operations.

Responsive (Formerly RFPIO) Overview: Key Features and Pricing

Responsive, previously known as RFPIO, has been a well-known RFP solution for more than a decade. It helps teams automate and simplify responses to RFPs, RFIs, DDQs, security questionnaires, and other complex information requests.

But as AI-driven automation becomes important for efficiency, organizations are evaluating whether its capabilities and its pricing still align with enterprise requirements.‍

1. AI-Driven Drafting and Automation

It uses AI to help draft and suggest answers, but it’s fairly basic. The AI can speed up the process, but responses often still need manual adjustments to fully meet the buyer’s requirements.

2. Collaborative Workflow Management

Teams can collaborate, assign tasks, and track progress with the workflow tools. However, these workflows lack flexibility and may not be robust enough for complex or multi-departmental RFPs.

3. Centralized Content Library

The content library helps organize and reuse proposal content. While useful, search and filtering options are basic, and it may become harder to find specific content as the library grows.

4. Integration with Enterprise Tools

It integrates with tools like Microsoft Office, CRM systems, Slack, and Teams. While this is helpful, syncing large amounts of data across multiple systems can cause delays or inconsistencies.

5. Analytics and Reporting

Responsive offers executive dashboards and content portfolio analytics designed to track ROI and win-loss trends; however, the impact of these insights often depends on the consistency of a team's CRM data and internal reporting habits.

6. Multilingual and Governance Features

It supports multiple languages and governance features, like role-based access and audit trails. However, it may not meet the more advanced compliance needs of larger organizations.

While Responsive offers some features to simplify RFP workflows, it's important to understand how its pricing aligns with the needs of larger teams and more complex operations.

Pricing Breakdown

You may need to upgrade to a custom tier as your RFP volume grows and you add users, integrations, or advanced features. To avoid surprises, budget for scaling costs. 

To determine the platform's total cost of ownership, smaller teams should carefully evaluate user seats, expected RFP volume, and integrations or support needs.

Must Read: Top 10 Best Proposal Software and Tools for 2025: Features, Pricing & more

How Inventive AI Outperforms Responsive (Formerly RFPIO)?

Inventive AI is designed to meet the real needs of enterprise teams handling complex RFPs and proposals. It offers faster responses, higher accuracy, and unmatched scalability, providing a clear advantage over Responsive.

With a 5-star rating on Gartner Peer Insights, Inventive AI stands out for its precision, efficiency, and ability to handle large-scale, multi-department workflows with ease. It simplifies the RFP process by automating drafting, ensuring real-time content governance, and offering context-aware AI, all while delivering consistently high-quality, customized content.

Where Responsive struggles with basic automation and limited AI depth, Inventive AI ensures faster turnarounds, better accuracy, and more effective collaboration across teams.

Here’s how Inventive AI excels:

1. 2X Better Response Quality

The quality of your responses directly impacts your chances of winning. Inventive AI consistently delivers 2x better response quality compared to Responsive. With Inventive AI, responses are contextually accurate, clear, and tailored to the buyer’s needs, significantly reducing the need for manual edits and ensuring more competitive proposals.

2. Advanced Context Engine

Unlike Responsive, which relies on basic AI tools, Inventive AI uses a multi-layer context engine that deeply understands the RFP. This ensures that every response is contextually relevant and accurate. Responsive’s AI, while useful, doesn’t offer the same depth of understanding, often leading to generic or mismatched responses.

3. Instant Conflict Detection

Inventive AI flags conflicting statements in real-time, ensuring that your proposals are consistent and coherent. This instant conflict detection prevents the risk of sending proposals with internal contradictions. Responsive lacks this feature, leaving teams at risk of submitting responses with discrepancies.

4. Proactive Outdated Content Detection

As content libraries grow, keeping them updated becomes challenging. Inventive AI automatically identifies and flags outdated or non-compliant content, ensuring only the most current and relevant material is used. In contrast, Responsive requires manual checks, increasing the chances of using stale or irrelevant content.

5. Quality Benchmarking for Consistency

Inventive AI benchmarks every generated response against your gold-standard content, ensuring the highest level of accuracy, clarity, and completeness. This quality benchmarking ensures every proposal is at the same high standard. Responsive lacks this built-in feature, meaning consistency is harder to maintain across proposals.

6. Narrative-Style Proposals

Inventive AI excels at creating long-form, narrative-style proposals, including executive summaries, one-pagers, and business proposals. This ability to generate complete, cohesive proposals is something Responsive can’t match, as it focuses primarily on Q&A-style responses. Inventive AI enables teams to produce full proposals and pitch decks effortlessly, saving time and ensuring a more comprehensive submission.

7. Faster and Accurate Responses

Inventive AI helps teams respond 10x faster by automating key parts of the RFP process, allowing them to meet deadlines and submit more proposals without losing quality. This leads to 50% higher win rates by improving proposal accuracy and reducing manual effort. With 95%+ accuracy and zero hallucinations, the content is reliable and precise, giving you a clear advantage over Responsive, which requires more revisions and manual work.

8. Scalable, AI-Driven Automation

As businesses grow, so do the complexity and volume of RFPs. Inventive AI is built to scale, providing advanced AI-driven automation to handle large volumes of complex RFPs seamlessly. In comparison, Responsive struggles with scalability for larger, global teams, limiting its ability to support enterprise-level operations.

When it comes to RFP automation, Inventive AI outperforms Responsive in every key aspect. If you’re looking for an AI-powered tool to simplify your RFP response process, increase win rates, and scale effortlessly, Inventive AI is the clear choice.

Curious about what users think of Inventive AI? Here’s what they have to say:

Must Read: How to Create an AI Supplier Questionnaire for Vendors

Responsive Strengths and Weaknesses

Like most mature RFP automation platforms, it provides a solid foundation for teams managing proposal responses. With a 4.2/5 rating on Gartner Peer Insights, it is frequently praised for its intuitive interface, centralized content library, and collaboration-friendly workflows that help sales and proposal teams stay aligned.

As organizations scale and their RFP operations become more complex, the platform’s limitations start to surface. Teams increasingly require deeper automation, stronger contextual AI, and scalable data governance. These are areas where traditional tools struggle to keep up. These gaps become more noticeable in high-volume environments involving multi-department reviews, complex questionnaires, and global compliance requirements.

Want to know what users think about the platform?

Let's see what the users have to say:

Strengths

• Time-Saving: Responsive automates basic RFP drafting, saving time and reducing manual effort. This helps businesses with manageable proposal volumes focus on strategic tasks, like refining responses and aligning with buyer needs.
• Simple and Intuitive Interface: Responsive is easy to use, with a user-friendly design that doesn’t require extensive training. This makes it ideal for smaller teams or businesses without dedicated technical staff, allowing for quicker implementation and smoother use.
• Easy Collaboration: Responsive allows real-time collaboration across teams, speeding up decision-making and ensuring alignment throughout the proposal process. This improves messaging consistency and enhances submission quality.

Weaknesses

• Limited Features: Responsive lacks some advanced tools, like content optimization, automatic updates, and deeper integrations, making it less effective for larger businesses that need to scale their RFP processes.
• Inefficient Search Functionality: Searching for specific content in Responsive can be slower compared to other platforms. As proposal volume grows, this inefficiency can waste time and reduce overall productivity.
• Limited Customization: Responsive offers fewer customization options, making it harder for companies with unique RFP workflows to tailor the platform to their needs as they grow.

Users have expressed frustration with these limitations, particularly around the learning curve and search functionality. As businesses grow and RFP volumes increase, these issues become more pronounced. Here’s what users have to say about their experience with the platform:

Must Read: What is an RFP? Key Components of an Effective RFP

Why Responsive (RFPIO) Isn’t Enough for Enterprise-Level Needs?

The tool has been a trusted RFP automation platform for many organizations, but it struggles to keep up with the demands of growing enterprises. As RFP processes become more complex and teams scale, their capabilities begin to show limitations.

Here are the key challenges enterprises face:

1. Limited Advanced Content Management

As your business grows, your basic content management system can’t keep up with complex content requirements, making it difficult to ensure consistency across proposals.

2. AI Response Quality Can Be Basic

It helps automate draft generation, but its AI‑generated responses may lack the depth, contextual understanding, and precision required for highly detailed or technical enterprise RFPs. Drafts often need significant manual refinement, which reduces the time savings expected from automation.

3. Scalability Issues

It works for small to mid-sized teams, but larger organizations may struggle with its lack of customization and the need for more advanced integrations.

4. Analytics and Insights Are Functional but Not Strategic

It offers analytics like dashboards, reporting, and content usage statistics, but these insights tend to be basic. At the enterprise level, teams often need deeper analytics, such as predictive win‑rate trends, content optimization insights, or performance benchmarking, to make data‑driven decisions.

5. Custom Pricing and Hidden Costs

It does not list pricing publicly, and enterprise teams often discover that necessary features like enhanced governance, advanced reporting, sandbox environments, or dedicated deployment support come with additional costs beyond the base subscription. This can make the total cost of ownership harder to predict.

Must Read: Guide to Creating Custom RFP Templates

Maximize Your RFP Success with Inventive AI

Inventive AI is built to help enterprises handle complex RFP processes more efficiently. With its multi-agent AI, context-aware drafting, and real-time content management, it allows teams to respond 10× faster to RFPs and RFIs, improving overall speed and quality.

While Responsive (formerly RFPIO) works well for smaller teams managing moderate RFP volumes, Inventive AI is designed to handle large-scale operations. Its advanced automation, customization, and ability to support global collaboration make it the right choice for businesses looking to scale without sacrificing quality.

Inventive AI offers:

• 10× faster to RFPs and RFIs.
• 50% higher win rates through improved response quality.
• 95%+ accuracy with verified, zero-hallucination content.
• Smooth collaboration across sales, legal, and proposal teams in one secure hub.

If you're looking for a scalable, intelligent, and precise solution that can handle complex RFP lifecycles and improve your win rates, Inventive AI is the ideal choice for enterprises ready to move beyond basic automation. Explore Inventive AI to simplify your proposal process and boost accuracy.

FAQs

1. What is Responsive (formerly RFPIO) used for?

Team members can automate parts of the RFP, RFI, and security questionnaire process with Responsive. It simplifies collaboration, centralizes content in a knowledge library, and lets multiple contributors work on responses simultaneously. 

2. How much does Responsive cost?

Responsive does not publish fixed pricing on its website. Market data and user reports suggest that pricing for smaller teams starts around $10,000 per year, with enterprise contracts often ranging between $50k–$100k+.

3. Is Responsive suitable for enterprise-level RFP management?

Responsive performs well for mid-market and enterprise teams with structured RFP processes, but it can become challenging to scale for complex, multi-department workflows or high-volume global operations. 

4. How does Inventive AI differ from Responsive (RFPIO)?

Inventive AI is an AI-powered RFP Response Software purpose-built for enterprise scalability and contextual accuracy. Its multi-agent AI system understands buyer intent, automates content generation, and validates every response with verified sources without hallucination, unlike traditional tools.

‍