Replacing Loopio and outperforming AutoRFP: Why Aquent's solo manager chose Inventive AI

A one-person RFP function handling 75–100 global RFPs a year now drafts from live source documents instead of an unmaintained library.

Checkmark icon inside a peach-colored circle on a white background.
75–100 RFPs a Year, One Manager

The whole global RFP function runs on one manager.

Checkmark icon inside a peach-colored circle on a white background.
Beat AutoRFP in a 3-Week Live Trial

Same RFPs, same content, both platforms run side by side.

Checkmark icon inside a peach-colored circle on a white background.
Onboarded in 1 Week, No Library Needed

Drafting from live documents with no library to maintain.

Aquent and Inventive AI case study cover

For Aquent, a global staffing and creative services company, 75 to 100 RFPs a year land on a single proposal manager. Its inherited Loopio library had gone unmaintained for 18 months because no one had time to keep it current. After a three-week live trial against AutoRFP, Aquent chose Inventive AI as its Loopio replacement for staffing firms. This case study is based on a conversation with Sophia Paul, Proposal Manager at Aquent.

Impact at a Glance

Aquent impact at a glance: A Solo Manager, Proven Head-to-Head

About Aquent

Aquent is a global staffing and creative services company operating brands including Aquent Studios, Scout and Skill. One manager handles 75 to 100 global RFPs a year.

The breaking point: a Loopio library gathering dust

Aquent inherited Loopio to manage its proposal content, but for a one-person team the platform became a bottleneck.

Q&A databases need constant manual upkeep to stay accurate. Without a dedicated content manager, Aquent's Loopio instance sat unmaintained for 18 months. As the content went stale, the RFP manager started turning to general-purpose AI tools just to hit deadlines.

"I don't have a dedicated content manager. It's partly why Loopio didn't work for us because I'm the sole person managing the function. Then having to maintain a content library just wasn't something that one person could feasibly handle with our volumes."
— Sophia Paul, Proposal Manager, Aquent

With renewal coming up, Aquent needed a Loopio replacement for staffing firms built around AI instead of a manually maintained database.

AutoRFP vs Inventive AI: testing both on live RFPs

Aquent looked at Responsive and Qvidian but ruled them out for feeling too similar to Loopio. The search for the best RFP tool for a one-person RFP team came down to a three-week, simultaneous trial of two AI-native platforms: AutoRFP and Inventive AI.

Instead of a sandbox, Aquent ran the same live RFPs and source content through both platforms at the same time.

What Sophia comparedWhat she found with Inventive AI
UsabilityMore accessible, cleaner and more intuitive
Response qualityDrafts more aligned with how she writes
EditingReal-time AI interaction inside the response, which other platforms she tested didn't match
"I've been literally doing simultaneous projects on Inventive and AutoRFP, and I just like yours, it's a lot more accessible. It's cleaner. It's much more intuitive... The quality of responses I was getting was way more aligned with kind of how I write. At a face value, yours just felt far superior."
— Sophia Paul, Proposal Manager, Aquent

Why Aquent's RFP manager rates Inventive AI above the other platforms she tested

Aquent signed with Inventive AI and was fully onboarded within a week.

Because Inventive AI works as an AI RFP response engine instead of a static database, it drafts answers from Aquent's live source documents and past proposals in the knowledge hub. There's no separate library for one person to keep current.

Live AI editing happens inside the response itself, through response generation, so the whole workflow stays in one place for a solo operator.

"It's pretty impressive. I do like the immediate AI feature, to be able to interact with it real time and have that live in your ecosystem. Other platforms I've tested don't have that capability, or at least they didn't perform as well as yours did."
— Sophia Paul, Proposal Manager, Aquent

Give a solo RFP manager the output of a full team with Inventive AI

Inventive AI helps lean professional services teams answer RFPs from the documents they already have.

Book a demo to see how Inventive AI handles RFPs like Aquent's.

Frequently Asked Questions

If I want to replace Loopio, what is the alternative?

AI-native RFP software that drafts from live source documents instead of a Q&A library that needs manual updates. Aquent replaced an unmaintained Loopio instance with Inventive AI for exactly that reason.

How does AutoRFP compare to Inventive AI in a live trial?

Aquent ran both on the same live RFPs and source content for three weeks and chose Inventive AI. Its RFP manager found it cleaner and more intuitive, with drafts closer to how she writes.

What is the best AI tool for a one-person proposal team?

One that removes upkeep instead of adding it. A solo manager needs drafts that come straight from existing documents and editing that happens inside the response, which is why Aquent chose Inventive AI as its AutoRFP alternative and Loopio replacement.

How should you run a live trial of RFP software?

Put the same live RFPs and the same source content through each platform at the same time, for long enough to cover a few full responses. Judge draft quality against how the team actually writes, plus how much editing each draft needs.

Why do Q&A library tools fail lean RFP teams?

The library only stays accurate if someone updates it after every product, policy or pricing change. With one person running the whole function, that upkeep falls behind, and the library goes stale.

How long does it take to onboard AI RFP software?

When it connects to existing documents instead of needing a library built first, it can be quick. Aquent was fully onboarded on Inventive AI within a week of signing.